Difference between Batch Gradient Descent and Stochastic Gradient Descent

Last Updated : 04 Mar, 2025

Gradient Descent is considered a complete algorithm, meaning it is guaranteed to find the global minimum, assuming sufficient time and a proper learning rate are chosen. Two widely used variants of Gradient Descent are Batch Gradient Descent and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). These variants differ mainly in how they process data and optimize the model parameters.

Batch Gradient Descent

Batch Gradient Descent computes the gradient of the cost function using the entire training dataset for each iteration. This approach ensures that the computed gradient is precise, but it can be computationally expensive when dealing with very large datasets.

Advantages of Batch Gradient Descent

Accurate Gradient Estimates: Since it uses the entire dataset, the gradient estimate is precise.
Good for Smooth Error Surfaces: It works well for convex or relatively smooth error manifolds.

Disadvantages of Batch Gradient Descent

Slow Convergence: Because the gradient is computed over the entire dataset, it can take a long time to converge, especially with large datasets.
High Memory Usage: Requires significant memory to process the whole dataset in each iteration, making it computationally intensive.
Inefficient for Large Datasets: With large-scale datasets, Batch Gradient Descent becomes impractical due to its high computation and memory requirements.

When to Use Batch Gradient Descent?

Batch Gradient Descent is ideal when the dataset is small to medium-sized and when the error surface is smooth and convex. It is also preferred when you can afford the computational cost.

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) addresses the inefficiencies of Batch Gradient Descent by computing the gradient using only a single training example (or a small subset) in each iteration. This makes the algorithm much faster since only a small fraction of the data is processed at each step.

Advantages of Stochastic Gradient Descent

Faster Convergence: Since the gradient is updated after each individual data point, the algorithm converges much faster than Batch Gradient Descent.
Lower Memory Requirements: As it processes only one data point at a time, it requires significantly less memory, making it suitable for large datasets.
Escape Local Minima: Due to its stochastic nature, SGD can escape local minima and find the global minimum, especially for non-convex functions.

Disadvantages of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)

Noisy Gradient Estimates: Since the gradient is based on a single data point, the estimates can be noisy, leading to less accurate results.
Convergence Issues: While SGD may converge quickly, it tends to oscillate around the minimum and does not settle exactly at the global minimum. This can be mitigated by gradually decreasing the learning rate.
Requires Shuffling: To ensure randomness, the dataset should be shuffled before each epoch.

When to Use Stochastic Gradient Descent?

SGD is particularly useful when dealing with large datasets, where processing the entire dataset at once is computationally expensive. It is also effective when optimizing non-convex loss functions.

Batch Gradient Descent vs Stochastic Gradient Descent

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of Batch Gradient Descent and Stochastic Gradient Descent:

Aspect	Batch Gradient Descent	Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)
Data Processing	Uses the whole training dataset to compute the gradient.	Uses a single training sample to compute the gradient.
Convergence Speed	Slower, takes longer to converge.	Faster, converges quicker due to frequent updates.
Convergence Accuracy	More accurate, gives precise gradient estimates.	Less accurate due to noisy gradient estimates.
Computational and Memory Requirements	Requires significant computation and memory.	Requires less computation and memory.
Optimization of Non-Convex Functions	Can get stuck in local minima.	Can escape local minima and find the global minimum.
Suitability for Large Datasets	Not ideal for very large datasets due to slow computation.	Can handle large datasets effectively.
Nature	Deterministic: Same result for the same initial conditions.	Stochastic: Results can vary with different initial conditions.
Learning Rate	Fixed learning rate.	Learning rate can be adjusted dynamically.
Shuffling of Data	No need for shuffling.	Requires shuffling of data before each epoch.
Overfitting	Can overfit if the model is too complex.	Can reduce overfitting due to more frequent updates.
Escape Local Minima	Cannot escape shallow local minima.	Can escape shallow local minima more easily.
Computational Cost	High due to processing the entire dataset at once.	Low due to processing one sample at a time.
Final Solution	Tends to converge to the global minimum for convex loss functions.	May converge to a local minimum or saddle point.

Both Batch Gradient Descent and Stochastic Gradient Descent are powerful optimization algorithms that serve different purposes depending on the problem at hand.

Batch Gradient Descent is more accurate but slower and computationally expensive. It is ideal when working with small to medium-sized datasets, and when high accuracy is required.
Stochastic Gradient Descent, on the other hand, is faster and requires less computational power, making it suitable for large datasets. It can also escape local minima more easily but may converge less accurately.

Choosing between the two algorithms depends on factors like the size of the dataset, computational resources, and the nature of the error surface.

Difference between Gradient Descent and Gradient Ascent?

nishkarsh146

Improve

Article Tags :

Practice Tags :

Machine Learning