Concurrency Control in DBMS
Last Updated : 29 Jan, 2025
In a database management system (DBMS), allowing transactions to run concurrently has significant advantages, such as better system resource utilization and higher throughput. However, it is crucial that these transactions do not conflict with each other. The ultimate goal is to ensure that the database remains consistent and accurate. For instance, if two users try to book the last available seat on a flight at the same time, the system must ensure that only one booking succeeds.Concurrency control is a critical mechanism in DBMS that ensures the consistency and integrity of data when multiple operations are performed at the same time.
- Concurrency control is a concept in Database Management Systems (DBMS) that ensures multiple transactions can simultaneously access or modify data without causing errors or inconsistencies. It provides mechanisms to handle the concurrent execution in a way that maintains ACID properties.
- By implementing concurrency control, a DBMS allows transactions to execute concurrently while avoiding issues such as deadlocks, race conditions, and conflicts between operations.
- The main goal of concurrency control is to ensure that simultaneous transactions do not lead to data conflicts or violate the consistency of the database. The concept of serializability is often used to achieve this goal.
In this article, we will explore the various concurrency control techniques in DBMS, understand their importance, and learn how they enable reliable and efficient database operations.
Concurrent Execution and Related Challenges in DBMS
In a multi-user system, several users can access and work on the same database at the same time. This is known as concurrent execution, where the database is used simultaneously by different users for various operations. For instance, one user might be updating data while another is retrieving it.
When multiple transactions are performed on the database simultaneously, it is important that these operations are executed in an interleaved manner. This means that the actions of one user should not interfere with or affect the actions of another. This helps in maintaining the consistency of the database. However, managing such simultaneous operations can be challenging, and certain problems may arise if not handled properly. These challenges need to be addressed to ensure smooth and error-free concurrent execution.
Concurrent Execution can lead to various challenges:
- Dirty Reads: One transaction reads uncommitted data from another transaction, leading to potential inconsistencies if the changes are later rolled back.
- Lost Updates: When two or more transactions update the same data simultaneously, one update may overwrite the other, causing data loss.
- Inconsistent Reads: A transaction may read the same data multiple times during its execution, and the data might change between reads due to another transaction, leading to inconsistency.
To read more about Concurrency Problems in DBMS Transactions Refer, Here.
Why is Concurrency Control Needed?
Consider the following example:
- Without Concurrency Control: Transactions interfere with each other, causing issues like lost updates, dirty reads or inconsistent results.
- With Concurrency Control: Transactions are properly managed (e.g., using locks or timestamps) to ensure they execute in a consistent, isolated manner, preserving data accuracy.
Concurrency control is critical to maintaining the accuracy and reliability of databases in multi-user environments. By preventing conflicts and inconsistencies during concurrent transactions, it ensures the database remains consistent and correct, even under high levels of simultaneous activity.
Concurrency Control Protocols
Concurrency control protocols are the set of rules which are maintained in order to solve the concurrency control problems in the database. It ensures that the concurrent transactions can execute properly while maintaining the database consistency. The concurrent execution of a transaction is provided with atomicity, consistency, isolation, durability, and serializability via the concurrency control protocols.
Cascadeless and Recoverable Schedules in Concurrency Control
1. Recoverable Schedules
- A recoverable schedule ensures that a transaction commits only if all the transactions it depends on have committed. This avoids situations where a committed transaction depends on an uncommitted transaction that later fails, leading to inconsistencies.
- Concurrency control ensures recoverable schedules by keeping track of which transactions depend on others. It makes sure a transaction can only commit if all the transactions it relies on have already committed successfully. This prevents issues where a committed transaction depends on one that later fails.
- Techniques like strict two-phase locking (2PL) enforce recoverability by delaying the commit of dependent transactions until the parent transactions have safely committed.
2. Cascadeless Schedules
- A cascadeless schedule avoids cascading rollbacks, which occur when the failure of one transaction causes multiple dependent transactions to fail.
- Concurrency control techniques such as strict 2PL or timestamp ordering ensure cascadeless schedules by ensuring dependent transactions only access committed data.
- By delaying read or write operations until the transaction they depend on has committed, cascading rollbacks are avoided.
To read more about different types of schedules based on Recoverability Refer, Here.
Advantages of Concurrency
In general, concurrency means that more than one transaction can work on a system. The advantages of a concurrent system are:
- Waiting Time: It means if a process is in a ready state but still the process does not get the system to get execute is called waiting time. So, concurrency leads to less waiting time.
- Response Time: The time wasted in getting the response from the CPU for the first time, is called response time. So, concurrency leads to less Response Time.
- Resource Utilization: The amount of Resource utilization in a particular system is called Resource Utilization. Multiple transactions can run parallel in a system. So, concurrency leads to more Resource Utilization.
- Efficiency: The amount of output produced in comparison to given input is called efficiency. So, Concurrency leads to more Efficiency.
Disadvantages of Concurrency
- Overhead: Implementing concurrency control requires additional overhead, such as acquiring and releasing locks on database objects. This overhead can lead to slower performance and increased resource consumption, particularly in systems with high levels of concurrency.
- Deadlocks: Deadlocks can occur when two or more transactions are waiting for each other to release resources, causing a circular dependency that can prevent any of the transactions from completing. Deadlocks can be difficult to detect and resolve, and can result in reduced throughput and increased latency.
- Reduced concurrency: Concurrency control can limit the number of users or applications that can access the database simultaneously. This can lead to reduced concurrency and slower performance in systems with high levels of concurrency.
- Complexity: Implementing concurrency control can be complex, particularly in distributed systems or in systems with complex transactional logic. This complexity can lead to increased development and maintenance costs.
- Inconsistency: In some cases, concurrency control can lead to inconsistencies in the database. For example, a transaction that is rolled back may leave the database in an inconsistent state, or a long-running transaction may cause other transactions to wait for extended periods, leading to data staleness and reduced accuracy.
Conclusion
Concurrency control ensures transaction atomicity, isolation, consistency and serializability. Concurrency control issues occur when many transactions execute randomly. A dirty read happens when a transaction reads data changed by an uncommitted transaction. When two transactions update data simultaneously, the Lost Update issue occurs. Lock-based protocol prevents incorrect read/write activities. Timestamp-based protocols organize transactions by timestamp.
Similar Reads
Tuple Relational Calculus (TRC) in DBMS Tuple Relational Calculus (TRC) is a non-procedural query language used in relational database management systems (RDBMS) to retrieve data from tables. TRC is based on the concept of tuples, which are ordered sets of attribute values that represent a single row or record in a database table. TRC is
4 min read
Introduction of Database Normalization Normalization is an important process in database design that helps improve the database's efficiency, consistency, and accuracy. It makes it easier to manage and maintain the data and ensures that the database is adaptable to changing business needs.Database normalization is the process of organizi
8 min read
Normal Forms in DBMS In the world of database management, Normal Forms are important for ensuring that data is structured logically, reducing redundancy, and maintaining data integrity. When working with databases, especially relational databases, it is critical to follow normalization techniques that help to eliminate
7 min read
Functional Dependency and Attribute Closure Functional dependency and attribute closure are essential for maintaining data integrity and building effective, organized, and normalized databases.Functional DependencyA functional dependency A->B in a relation holds if two tuples having the same value of attribute A must have the same value fo
5 min read
Lossless Decomposition in DBMS The original relation and relation reconstructed from joining decomposed relations must contain the same number of tuples if the number is increased or decreased then it is Lossy Join decomposition. Lossless join decomposition ensures that never get the situation where spurious tuples are generated
5 min read
Dependency Preserving Decomposition - DBMS In a Database Management System (DBMS), dependency-preserving decomposition refers to the process of breaking down a complex database schema into simpler, smaller tables, such that all the functional dependencies of the original schema are still enforceable without needing to perform additional join
7 min read
Lossless Join and Dependency Preserving Decomposition Decomposition of a relation is done when a relation in a relational model is not in appropriate normal form. Relation R is decomposed into two or more relations if decomposition is lossless join as well as dependency preserving. Lossless Join DecompositionIf we decompose a relation R into relations
4 min read
How to find the highest normal form of a relation Normalization is the process of structuring data in a database by creating tables and defining relationships between them. This ensures data consistency, protection, and improves the database's efficiency and flexibility. Typically, every table in a relational database is assumed to be in the first
5 min read
Equivalence of Functional Dependencies Equivalence of functional dependencies means two sets of functional dependencies (FDs) are considered equivalent if they enforce the same constraints on a relation. This happens when every FD in one set can be derived from the other set and vice versa using inference rules like Armstrong's axioms.Eq
5 min read
Canonical Cover of Functional Dependencies in DBMS Managing a large set of functional dependencies can result in unnecessary computational overhead. This is where the canonical cover becomes useful. The canonical cover of a set of functional dependencies F is a simplified version of F that retains the same closure as the original set, ensuring no re
7 min read