- From: Jean-Fran?ois BAGET <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 09:56:31 +0200
- To: <[email protected]>
Dear Guus, Here is what I scribed during yesterday telecon. Will you post it to the mailing list or shall I do it? I did not catch the name for the proposed action: ACTION: Clarify "Class description" in Reference XXX? //Missed the name here Do you have any hint? Greetings, Jean-Franois Baget ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------- AGENDA Teleconference Web Ontology Working Group May 22, 1200 (East US), 0900 (West US). 1700 (London), 1800 (Budapest) Duration: 50 min (the shortest meeting in the group history!) Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 then 9326#. IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #webont 1. Administrivia Chair: Guus Schreiber Scribe: Jean-Franois Baget Role Call PRESENT (9): Guus Schreiber, Jean-Franois Baget, Jeff Heflin, Mike Smith, Masahiro Hori, Jos De Roo, Ziv Hellman, Leo Obrst, Christopher Welty REGRETS: Yasser alSafadi, John Stanton, Deborah McGuinness, Charles White, Sean Bechhofer, Ian Horrocks, Nick Gibbins, Mike Dean, Sandro Hawke, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Hermann Ter Horst, Jerome Euzenat. NOTE: Few member present, due to WWW 2003 (Budapest) Approve Minutes of May 15: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0271.html APPROVED Next telecon: May 29, chair Hendler, scribe Hawke (to be confirmed) CONFIRMED 2. Action item review ACTION: Jim Hendler to report back on implementation feedback. CONTINUED ACTION: Dan Connolly to create a test for imports DONE ACTION: Jim Hendler and Dan Connolly to compose a response to the LC comment on local and compound keys. CONTINUED ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to work on proof for issue 5.26 B1,B2 CONTINUED ACTION: Dan Connolly publish XML syntax CONTINUED ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider and Jeremy Carroll to discuss solutions to bugs in RDF Semantics in Budapest CONTINUED ACTION: Jeremy Carroll to make changes to test document concerning datatypes, as discussed CONTINUED ACTION: Pat Hayes and Ian Horrocks will review changes DONE ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to design test that shows effects of recent proposed changes to RDF datatyping and sent to Jeremy Carroll DONE ACTION: Sandro Hawke to do publishing of Test CONTINUED ACTION: Jim Hendler respond to XMLLiteral response DONE 3. LC comments Overview of general comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0280.html 3.1 Proposed response to Golbeck's comment on owl:imports (Heflin): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0301.html Discussion on Jeff Heflin rewording proposal for Guide and Reference. Is there a need to reopen that issue? Jeff will CONTINUE his work on imports. ACTION: Mike Smith and Guus Schreiber will review proposed changes to Guide and Reference for next telecom. Discussion: Huge ontology in a single file seem manageable for reasoning purposes, what about numerous interrelated ontologies? Discussion: Closure and cycles in imports ACTION: Jeff will post proposed response ACTION: Mike Smith will pdate issue list 5.06 3.2 RDFCore: NP completeness of owl/RDF mapping http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052. html Description of the problem with possible fixes (Carroll): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0003.html Response by Patel-Scheider: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0004.html NOT DISCUSSED 3.3 RDFCore: owl:class not needed? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0004. html #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation It has been suggested to RDFCore that owl:Class is not needed. RDFCore requests the creation of test cases to clearly illustrate the differences between owl:Class and rdfs:Class. ACTION: Mike Smith to update issue list 5.20 about synonyms in RDF/OWL with the specific problem of owl:Class vs rdfs:Class ACTION: Jos de Roo to propose a test based on the example given by peter About Test document: 4 weeks last call period after Budapest. Proposed Recommandation: June 30? 3.4 Other issues wrt. LC comments ACTION: Guus to propose a definition for "class description". ACTION: Mike Smith to update the Guide glossary accordingly (possibly removing "class expression"). Discussion about Topic Maps (more in Budapest) Comment of Varant does not appear to involve ssues wrt. our specs. 3.5 WG Schedule Test document: 4 weeks last call period after Budapest. Tentative date for request for Proposed/Candidate recommandation: June 30. 3.6 XMLLiteral examples for I18N (Carroll) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0285.html NOT DISCUSSED 4. AOB
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2003 03:57:01 UTC