- From: Nick Gibbins <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:29:03 +0100
- To: [email protected]
Guus Schreiber <[email protected]> writes: > WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP > AGENDA/LOGISTICS > April 11, 2002 > CHAT INFO Log: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/11-webont-irc > Chair: Hendler/Schreiber Chair: Dan Connolly <[email protected]> (Guus was to have chaired, but arrived late. Dan took the chair in his absence.) > Scribe: ... Scribe: Nick Gibbins <[email protected]> > 1) Join call/attendance/admin (10 min) See attendance list at end. > ACTION (Mar 14) John Stanton: report back on different kinds of tests WITHDRAWN > ACTION (Mar 21) FrankH: annotated version of lang proposal. DONE > ACTION (Mar 28) Guus: organize ftf telecon facilities both days > 16.45-17.30 DONE > ACTION (Mar 28) DanC, Lynn Stein (prov.), Jos De Roo, to participate > in RDF core discussions on construct for closed lists CONTINUES > Action (Mar 28) Updated decision-tree doc for ftf DONE > ACTION (Mar 28) Chairs to clarify OWL naming problem CONTINUES > 2) Recap face-to-face (chairs, 45 min) Recap of face-to-face by Jim Hendler for those that couldn't make it: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/11-webont-irc#T16-14-18 > Q&A session plus discussion about > - resolutions List of resolutions to be posted to list by Jim when he recovers data from his laptop. Until then, see: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T14-14-14 RESOLUTION: The meaning of an OWL document is conveyed in the RDF graph ==> ALL in favour, NO opposed RESOLUTION: All RDF/XML documents that are equivalent under the RDF Recommendation are equivalent OWL exchange documents ==> 14 in favor -- 3 opposed RESOLUTION: The exchange language for OWL is RDF/XML ==> 16 in favour RESOLUTION: We intend to produce non-normative presentation syntaxes and their mapping to the exchange syntax ==> 16 in favour -- 1 opposed RESOLUTION: The preference of the WG is to produce at least one XML and one frame presentation syntax ==> 11 in favour -- 2 opposed Dan Connolly raised the procedural point that resolutions with dissent may need to be kept in the issues list. Jim Hendler explained that dissenting WG members will be given the opportunity to explain reasons for dissent before publication. > - follow-up actions ACTION (April 9): chairs Send message to SWCG to the effect that, to achieve aims in charter, need a dark (unasserted) triple mechanism in RDF. http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T12-40-23 ACTION (April 9): Mike Dean, Enrico Motta, Ziv Hellman, Raphael Volz, Ian Horrocks and Frank van Harmelen Following polls on separation of language features between level 1 (OWL-lite) and level 2 (OWL-full), a group was constituted to revisit the level 1/2 conformance issue: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/09-webont-irc#T14-08-19 > - issue list List of potential new issues raised at face-to-face has been mailed out: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0078.html Issues from this list will move to the main issues list (maintained by Mike Smith) as and when WG members write them up (in same format as existing issues) and mail them to the list. Discussion of non-normative presentation syntaxes and round-tripping: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/11-webont-irc#T16-30-52 > - WG schedule ALL: WG schedule Guus Schreiber (Wed, Mar 27 2002) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Mar/0313.html Semantic Web Coordination Group needs to be consulted prior to schedule revision; we need to be sure that the revised schedule is realistic before this. > 3) A.O.B. (5 min) Deborah McGuinness repeated suggestion for an informal meeting at KR2002: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0075.html Regrets for Ian Horrocks, Deborah McGuinness for 18 April 2002 telecon. > - April 18 scribe No volunteers, TBD. > - Telecon on April 25?! (KR conference) Left unresolved. Attendance: N 1. *ALT James Barnette, Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) N 2. Jonathan Borden, [email protected] (Invited Expert; intro) N 3. *ALT Frederik Brysse, Ivis Group, Limited [email protected] Y 4. Stephen Buswell, Stilo Technology [email protected], [email protected] N 5. Jeremy Carroll, Hewlett Packard Company [email protected], [email protected] Y 6. Dan Connolly, W3C Team contact [email protected] R 7. Jonathan Dale, Fujitsu Limited [email protected] Y 8. Jos De Roo, Agfa-Gevaert N. V. [email protected] N 9. *ALT D.C. De Roure, University of Southampton [email protected] N 10. Mike Dean [email protected] N 11. Stefan Decker, Stanford [email protected] Y 12. Larry Eshelman, Philips Electronics N.V. [email protected] Y 13. Dieter Fensel, Ibrow, [email protected] Y 14. Tim Finin, University of Maryland MIND Laboratory [email protected] Y 15. Nicholas Gibbins, University of Southampton [email protected] N 16. Pat Hayes, [email protected] Y 17. Jeff Heflin [email protected] N 18. Ziv Hellman, <[email protected]>, Unicorn Solutions Inc. Y 19. James Hendler, Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab at the University of Maryland [email protected] N 20. Bernard Horan [email protected] Sun Microsystems, Inc. Y 21. Ian Horrocks, Network Inference [email protected] N 22. Francesco Iannuzzelli, <[email protected]>, Ivis Group Limited N 23. *ALT Mario Jeckle, Daimler Chrysler Research and Technology [email protected] N 24. Ruediger Klein, Daimler Chrysler Research and Technology [email protected] N 25. *ALT Natasha Kravtsova, Philips Electronic N.V. [email protected] N 26. Ora Lassila, Nokia [email protected], [email protected] N 27. *ALT Alexander Maedche, <[email protected]>, Forschungszentrum Informatik Y 28. Deborah McGuinness, Stanford [email protected] R 29. Libby Miller, University of Bristol [email protected] N 30. Enrico Motta, Ibrow [email protected] Y 31. Leo Obrst, MITRE [email protected] N 32. Laurent Olivry EDF (Electricite De France) [email protected] N 33. Peter Patel-Schneider, Lucent Technologies [email protected] N 34. Martin Pike, Stilo Technology [email protected] N 35. Marwan Sabbouh, MITRE [email protected] Y 36. Guus Schreiber, Ibrow [email protected] N 37. Shimizu Noboru, Interoperability Technology Association for Information Processing, Japan (INTAP) N 38. *ALT Michael Sintek, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Gmbh [email protected] Y 39. Michael Smith, Electronic Data System (EDS) [email protected] N 40. Ned Smith, Intel [email protected] N 41. John Stanton, Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) [email protected] [email protected] Y 42. Lynn Andrea Stein, [email protected] N 43. *ALT Patrick Stickler, Nokia [email protected] N 44. Said Tabet, Nisus, Inc. N 45. Herman ter Horst, Philips Electronic N.V. [email protected] Y 46. Lynne R. Thompson, Unisys Corporation [email protected] R 47. David Trastour, Hewlett Packard Company [email protected], [email protected] R 48. Frank van Harmelen, Ibrow [email protected] N 49. Raphael Volz, <[email protected]>, Forschungszentrum Informatik (FZI) Y 50. Evan Wallace, [email protected], National Institute of Standards and technology Y 51. Christopher Welty, <[email protected]>, IBM Corporation Y Massimo Marchiori <[email protected]>, W3C (tam contact for f2f) Y *ALT Gerd Wagner, Nisus -- Nick Gibbins [email protected] IAM (Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia) tel: +44 (0) 23 80592831 Electronics and Computer Science fax: +44 (0) 23 80592865 University of Southampton
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 10:29:05 UTC